Mao Zedong ‘Killed 45 Million In Four Years’, The Greatest Mass Murderer In World History

Mao’s Great Leap Forward ‘killed 45 million in four years’

Mao Zedong presided over a regime responsible for the deaths of up to 45 million people

Mao Zedong, founder of the People’s Republic of China, qualifies as the greatest mass murderer in world history, an expert who had unprecedented access to official Communist Party archives said yesterday.

Speaking at The Independent Woodstock Literary Festival, Frank Dikötter, a Hong Kong-based historian, said he found that during the time that Mao was enforcing the Great Leap Forward in 1958, in an effort to catch up with the economy of the Western world, he was responsible for overseeing “one of the worst catastrophes the world has ever known”.

Mr Dikötter, who has been studying Chinese rural history from 1958 to 1962, when the nation was facing a famine, compared the systematic torture, brutality, starvation and killing of Chinese peasants to the Second World War in its magnitude. At least 45 million people were worked, starved or beaten to death in China over these four years; the worldwide death toll of the Second World War was 55 million.

Mr Dikötter is the only author to have delved into the Chinese archives since they were reopened four years ago. He argued that this devastating period of history – which has until now remained hidden – has international resonance. “It ranks alongside the gulags and the Holocaust as one of the three greatest events of the 20th century…. It was like [the Cambodian communist dictator] Pol Pot’s genocide multiplied 20 times over,” he said.

Between 1958 and 1962, a war raged between the peasants and the state; it was a period when a third of all homes in China were destroyed to produce fertiliser and when the nation descended into famine and starvation, Mr Dikötter said.

His book, Mao’s Great Famine; The Story of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, reveals that while this is a part of history that has been “quite forgotten” in the official memory of the People’s Republic of China, there was a “staggering degree of violence” that was, remarkably, carefully catalogued in Public Security Bureau reports, which featured among the provincial archives he studied. In them, he found that the members of the rural farming communities were seen by the Party merely as “digits”, or a faceless workforce. For those who committed any acts of disobedience, however minor, the punishments were huge.

State retribution for tiny thefts, such as stealing a potato, even by a child, would include being tied up and thrown into a pond; parents were forced to bury their children alive or were doused in excrement and urine, others were set alight, or had a nose or ear cut off. One record shows how a man was branded with hot metal. People were forced to work naked in the middle of winter; 80 per cent of all the villagers in one region of a quarter of a million Chinese were banned from the official canteen because they were too old or ill to be effective workers, so were deliberately starved to death.

Mr Dikötter said that he was once again examining the Party’s archives for his next book, The Tragedy of Liberation, which will deal with the bloody advent of Communism in China from 1944 to 1957.

He said the archives were already illuminating the extent of the atrocities of the period; one piece of evidence revealed that 13,000 opponents of the new regime were killed in one region alone, in just three weeks. “We know the outline of what went on but I will be looking into precisely what happened in this period, how it happened, and the human experiences behind the history,” he said.

Mr Dikötter, who teaches at the University of Hong Kong, said while it was difficult for any historian in China to write books that are critical of Mao, he felt he could not collude with the “conspiracy of silence” in what the Chinese rural community had suffered in recent history.

By Arifa Akbar, Arts Correspondent
Friday, 17 September 2010

Source: The Independent

1 thought on “Mao Zedong ‘Killed 45 Million In Four Years’, The Greatest Mass Murderer In World History”


    China’s mortality during the GLF was no higher than India’s, Pakistan’s, and Indonesia’s at the time. Dikotter’s figures imply this. Consider the following:

    * Dikotter adopts 10/1000 as a ‘normal’ yearly death rate for China, and claims this as the figure for China just before the leap in 1957. Deaths above this are regarded as ‘excess’ deaths.

    * 10/1000 was the mortality in advanced industrialised West in 1960.

    * But mortality for the other big Asian countries in 1960: India 24/1000, Indonesia 23/1000, Pakistan 23/1000

    * Dikotter says GLF started early 1958, ended late 1962. ie nearly 5 years, and killed 45 million. This means 9 million excess deaths per year. Adopting 660 million as China’s population – the approx average excess mortality over these 5 years is 1000 x 9 mil/660 mil = 13.6 or say 14/1000.

    * Total annual mortality during GLF is thus 10/1000 + 14/1000 = 24/1000

    * Thus based on Dikotter’s figures mortality during the GLF was practically the same as that of India, Indonesia, and Pakistan (after China the most populous Asian nations).

    * Dikotter’s mortality rate during the GLF was much less than the 1949 figure (24 < 38/1000)

    * Dikotter's mortality rate during the GLF was less than that of India's at end of British rule (24 < 28/1000)

    Dikotter's claims imply China reduced mortality from 38 /1000 in 1949 to 10/1000 in 1957. If true, this would have been a stunning achievement, considering India only reduced mortality from 28 to 23/1000, and Indonesia 26 to 23/1000 over more or less the same period. In fact India and Indonesia had not reduced down to 10/1000, even by 1980.

    This of course would make Mao a great saver of lives – even with the elevated mortality seen during the GLF (which was not particularly high for the time). Is this what Dikotter intends to say? If not, his own claims inescapably imply it.


    China: 38/1000 (Bannister)
    India: 28/1000
    Indonesia: 26/1000

    China: 10/1000 (claimed by Dikotter: lower than the UK and France in 1960!)

    1958 to 1962 (averaged over 5 years – Dikotter claims GLF from early 1958 to late 1962):
    China: 23.8/1000

    India: 24/1000
    Indonesia: 23/1000
    South Korea: 13.5/1000
    UK: 11.5/1000
    US: 9.5/1000

    India: 17.6/1000
    Indonesia: 17/1000

    India: 12.9/1000
    Indonesia: 12.15/1000


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.