The Pentagon Has A Problem: ‘Vetting Moderate Al Qaeda Rebels Can Be Tough’ – So Here Is A Simple Solution … (Humor)

The Pentagon Has A Problem: “Vetting Moderate Al Qaeda Rebels Can Be Tough” – So Here Is A Simple Solution… (ZeroHedge, June 27, 2014):

When we reported yesterday that Obama had submitted yet another $500 million funding request to arm “moderate” Syrian rebels as opposed to extreme al-Qaeda cannibals and other ISIS faithful, we noted the glaring oversight at the heart of this plan when we asked “how will Obama make the distinction? Well, that’s what polling is all about. To wit: “Excuse me, would you describe yourself as a moderate or extreme al-Qaeda jihadist. Answering affirmatively to the former assures you your own US-made Humvee and a few thousand bullets to shoot at US soldiers across the border in Iraq.” Today, none other than the Pentagon’s rear admiral John Kirby confirmed precisely these worries when he said, via Bloomberg:


While we share his sentiment (which we doubt is much of a concern to the US MIC as it will merely provide one set of US-made weapons to destroy another set of US-made weapons) we repeat that there is a very simple solution. It comes from Andy Borowitz, who appears to have read our mind, and is breathtakingly simple.

Presenting: The Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form

After announcing, on Thursday, that it would seek $500 million to help “train and equip appropriately vetted elements of the moderate Syrian armed opposition,” the White House today posted the following Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form:

Welcome to the United States’ Moderate Syrian Rebel Vetting Process. To see if you qualify for $500 million in American weapons, please choose an answer to the following questions:

As a Syrian rebel, I think the word or phrase that best describes me is:

A) Moderate
B) Very moderate
C) Crazy moderate
D) Other

I became a Syrian rebel because I believe in:

A) Truth
B) Justice
C) The American Way
D) Creating an Islamic caliphate

If I were given a highly lethal automatic weapon by the United States, I would:

A) Only kill exactly the people that the United States wanted me to kill
B) Try to kill the right people, with the caveat that I have never used an automatic weapon before
C) Kill people only after submitting them to a rigorous vetting process
D) Immediately let the weapon fall into the wrong hands

I have previously received weapons from:

A) Al Qaeda
B) The Taliban
C) North Korea
D) I did not receive weapons from any of them because after they vetted me I was deemed way too moderate

I consider ISIS:

A) An existential threat to Iraq
B) An existential threat to Syria
C) An existential threat to Iraq and Syria
D) The people who will pick up my American weapon after I drop it and run away

Complete the following sentence. “American weapons are…”

A) Always a good thing to randomly add to any international hot spot
B) Exactly what this raging civil war has been missing for the past three years
C) Best when used moderately
D) Super easy to resell online

Thank you for completing the Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form. We will process your application in the next one to two business days. Please indicate a current mailing address where you would like your weapons to be sent. If there is no one to sign for them we will leave them outside the front door.

3 thoughts on “The Pentagon Has A Problem: ‘Vetting Moderate Al Qaeda Rebels Can Be Tough’ – So Here Is A Simple Solution … (Humor)”

  1. I consider all news fed us as propaganda.
    I don’t believe anything US or Euro media tells us.
    I think there is a gaggle of fools who believe we are overpopulated, and that they ought to be given the right to survive, regardless if they are of any value or not.
    I have no faith in any propaganda sold us through the printed page, and even less in anything I might hear.
    Believe half of what you see, none of what you hear.
    We were given the right to reason in order to use it, not being told what we ought to know.
    Believe nothing.

  2. The Pentagon has a problem in the fact that the “terrorist threat” that it has been working so desperately to create simply doesn’t exist. Could our bombing and wholesale slaughter of the populations of middle east countries have anything to do with it? Obviously we have created a huge refugee problem but these refugees are incapable of becoming a threat until they are trained, funded, and equipped by the CIA, FBI, or our benevolent military industrial complex. It’s been 14 years an still no credible threat has emerged that can possibly justify the outrageously excessive defense budget we all have to pay for. The one thing that the experts who designed the “perfect enemy” forgot was credibility. The fact that the main stream media is now totally owned and operated by the same greedy bastards who gave us 9/11 should be readily apparent.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.