Desperate Fukushima City Residents Dump Nuclear Waste In Parks, Forests And By The River

And Fukushima City should be evacuated:

Kobe University Radiation Expert Prof. Tomoya Yamauchi On Fukushima City (290,000 People): ‘Evacuation Must Be Conducted As Soon As Possible’

Alert: Greenpeace Radiation Measurements In Fukushima City: Hot Spots At 500-700 Times Normal!!! (Video)

Fukushima City (Over 290,000 People) Is In Danger: Greenpeace Detects Cobalt-60 And High Radiation ‘Hot Spots’ – Children Should Be Evacuated Immediately

Fukushima residents dump radiated soil in absence of plan (Reuters, July 5, 2011):

FUKUSHIMA, Japan (Reuters) – They scoop up soil from their gardens and dump it in holes dug out in parks and nearby forests, scrub their roofs with soap and refuse to let their children play outside.

More than three months after a massive earthquake and tsunami triggered a nuclear meltdown at a nearby power plant, Fukushima residents are scrambling to cope with contamination on their own in the absence of a long-term plan from the government.

“Everything and everyone here is paralysed and we feel left on our own, unsure whether it’s actually safe for us to stay in the city,” said Akiko Itoh, 42, with her four-year old son in her lap.

Even though this city of 300,000 lies outside of the 30-km evacuation zone around the crippled Fukushima Daiichi plant, a recent survey showed radiation levels in several spots exceed 13 millisieverts per year, more than six times natural levels.

As increasingly panicked residents take matters into their own hands, experts warn that their do-it-yourself efforts to reduce contamination risk making matters worse by allowing radiation to spread without monitoring and by creating hotspots of high radioactivity where soil is piled high.

“I scooped up all the radioactive soil and grass from my garden and dumped it in the forest, so no one could find it,” said a mother of a four-year-old child from Fukushima city, who did not want to be identified by name.

“When I put my Geiger counter close to that mountain of soil it showed 10 microseverts per hour,” she said. That is more than four times the official annual nuclear exposure limit. Others were spotted dumping their nuclear waste in public parks and by the river, residents said.

Experts say the longer it takes Japanese authorities to organise a clean-up the greater the risk of additional, long-lasting damage.

“Such clusters of radiation can also leak into the groundwater and pose more health hazards for a sustained period,” said Takumi Gotoh, a Nagoya-based cancer specialist.

“That’s why Japan urgently needs a comprehensive, long-term plan to deal with the issue,” Gotoh said.


Since late May authorities have been removing topsoil from school grounds in the affected areas, by packing it in tarps and burying it in holes in the grounds as a stopgap measure intended to reduce exposure for children.

“They say this is just a temporary solution. But we are worried they may take years before removing the contaminated soil for good,” says Seiichi Nakate from “Fukushima Network for Saving Children from Radiation,” a non-profit citizens group.

Experts have said that they don’t know and can’t yet estimate how much radioactive soil might have to be removed after Fukushima, but say the amount will be massive based on historical precedent.

For example, after British nuclear testing in remote South Australia that ended in 1963, more than two cubic kilometers of soil had to be removed. After an American B-52 carrying nuclear bombs crashed in south Spain in 1966, more than 1,000 cubic meters of soil had to be removed and sent back to the United States for storage as nuclear waste.

Many see the best storage site as the Fukushima nuclear plant, but experts warn that will mean waiting until at least 2012 when efforts to stabilise the plant are scheduled to wind down.

“The soil ultimately should be taken to those who are responsible for this mess, that is Tokyo Electric,” said Nakate.

The International Commission on Radiological Protectionhas issued guidelines that urge governments dealing with a nuclear emergency to set up a radiation monitoring system with a detailed read-out on hotspots and a health monitoring system for the affected population.

While checking radiation in schools is now commonplace, health check-ups have only started in the worst-affected areas. Tokyo has promised that the radiation hotspot map will be ready by October — seven months after the disaster.

In the meantime, the continued uncertainty puts communities already increasingly distrustful of officialdom under even greater strain, residents and local officials say.

“What is the government doing? How many of them actually came to Fukushima to listen to the concerns of the people living here?” said Yoshinori Kasuya, assembly member of Fukushima city council.

3 thoughts on “Desperate Fukushima City Residents Dump Nuclear Waste In Parks, Forests And By The River”

  1. The damage is continuing unabated 24/7. The radiation is especially strong over Japan, Alaska, WA, OR & CA and moving east around the world.Telling the Japanese & US citizens lies and disinformation solves nothing. MSM won’t touch this story, all the news outlets are silenced by their corporate owners, and nobody knows what to do. This is an unprecedented event, and as usual, profits were more important than human life. The most frightening thing about this is the fact nobody can stop the fallout.
    Thanks for your excellent coverage of this story, most news outlets are too cowardly to touch.
    Marilyn Gjerdrum

  2. That people’s panic responses are sometimes counterproductive can’t really be a surprise. What seems strange to western eyes is the statement that Tokyo (which probably will have a new government by then) will have the radiation hotspot map ‘ready by October’ – given the presence of US military UAVs made available, aerial imaging should provide a first order approximation far sooner ,,,

    My own view is that the radioactive waste should be encased in a new concrete sea wall, needed anyway “just in case” another tsunami of similar or greater proportions hits before the ‘wind down’ is completed [let’s call it 4 years for the cooling ponds, 7 years for the reactor cores].


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.