US Treasury bloodbath soaks top fund managers

“If I were clairvoyant and knew we were going to have a sell-off of this magnitude, I would’ve been all in cash ….”

I have predicted this scenario many, many months ago and I have posted as much important information as I could find on the bond bubble. You do not have to be clairvoyant to know this.

Formerly safe bonds are increasingly a risky investment (Chicago Tribune):
“The seemingly safest of bonds look like they’ve been transformed from security blankets into bombs.”

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Investors have been blindsided by one financial catastrophe after another over the last 18 months, but throughout the tumult, the government bond market has been their friend.

Until now.

A brutal drop in long-dated Treasury prices has caught even the best money managers off guard — in some cases wiping out as much as 60 percent of the gains they booked in last year’s huge rally in U.S. Treasuries.

The Vanguard Group, Fidelity Investments, T. Rowe Price and Hoisington Investment Management have seen their government funds down anywhere between 10 percent and 30 percent, as record amounts of debt flood the market to pay for the swelling budget deficit.

What’s stunning about the portfolio declines is the swift plunge in Treasury prices within a short period of time despite the Federal Reserve’s buyback purchases intended to hold down interest rates. Benchmark 10-year Treasury yields have surged to levels not seen in more than six months, resulting in meaningful losses for many portfolios.

The 10-year T-note and 30-year Treasury bond are down 8.58 percent and 24 percent, respectively, in terms of price for the year to date.

“If I were clairvoyant and knew we were going to have a sell-off of this magnitude, I would’ve been all in cash, but I’m not,” said Van Hoisington, whose flagship Wasatch-Hoisington U.S. Treasury Fund is down more than 20 percent.

To be fair, not all Treasury-oriented funds like Hoisington’s represent an expression of a firm’s macro view of economic growth or lackthereof. Some bond funds, such as the Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury Index Institutional, hold Treasuries for actuarial reasons.


Even so, the losses are massive. Some of the rise in yields and slide in Treasury prices is due to investors’ appetite for riskier fare like stocks, junk bonds and corporate debt, which have been performing well on signs the recession is easing.

Indeed, for much of 2008 and earlier this year, investors piled into U.S. government debt during the credit crisis, sending yields to historic lows and triggering talk of a bubble similar to that of the Nasdaq’s Internet-led bubble, which expanded in the late 1990s and burst in March 2000.

But there also have been concerns about America’s long-term financial health, which has set in motion a huge domino effect — leading money managers such as Hoisington to stay bullish on Treasuries.

“We ain’t seen nothing yet in terms of the gazillion amount of Treasuries coming to fund our stimulus programs,” said Dan Fuss, vice chairman of Loomis Sayles, which oversees more than $107.7 billion in assets.


On May 21, Moody’s Investors Service said while it is comfortable with America’s AAA debt rating, it is not guaranteed forever against the backdrop of its deteriorating fiscal position. That helped exacerbate market fears that the United States remains ever more vulnerable to lose its coveted triple-A rating with its need to borrow $2 trillion — or 14 percent of the country’s total economic output and more than twice the record of 6 percent set in 1983.

That also has set off a chain reaction, notably with the so-called “bond vigilantes.” Veteran Wall Street strategist Ed Yardeni coined the term “bond vigilantes” to describe the huge appetite for yield of investors in the 1980s, who got burned in the ’70s; these investors demanded higher yields to compensate for perceived risks of inflation and budget deficits.

The phenomenon seems premature to some investors in Treasuries.

“If zero growth is gonna result in inflation, it’s a new economic paradigm as far as I’m concerned,” Hoisington said.

His fund was up an astounding 37.77 percent in 2008.

“We do not have a forecast of runaway growth, nor does the Fed,” added Brian Brennan, manager of the T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long-Term bond fund, which is down nearly 11 percent. Conversely, his fund was up more than 23 percent last year.

The standout of the crowd, however, is Vanguard. Its Extended Duration fund, which is down over 33 percent so far this year, “is not an expression of our macro call,” Ken Volpert, head of the Taxable Bond Group at The Vanguard Group, where he oversees about $200 billion in assets, told Reuters.

Volpert said the fund, which was up 55.52 percent in 2008, is primarily intended for pension plans and other institutional investors that want to closely match long-term liabilities with a portfolio of U.S. Treasury securities of similar long-term duration. He added that credit conditions have improved dramatically and confidence has come back into the markets and economy to feed the belief in recovery.

Even so, “somebody lost their shirt … 33 percent is no small chunk of change,” said Jeff Tjornehoj, research manager at Lipper Inc, a funds research firm owned by Thomson Reuters.

(Reporting by Jennifer Ablan; Editing by Jan Paschal)

Fri Jun 5, 2009 3:22pm EDT
By Jennifer Ablan – Analysis

Source: Reuters

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.