Antonin Scalia

Was Justice Scalia Murdered? Forget ‘Conspiracy Theory.’ This Is Real.

by

– Was Justice Scalia murdered? Forget “conspiracy theory.” This is real.:

Was Scalia murdered? Forget “conspiracy theory.” This is real.

by Jon Rappoport

February 15, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Let’s jump right in with quotes from the Washington Post, 2/15, “Conspiracy theories swirl around the death of Antonin Scalia”. The Post published extraordinary statements from the Facebook page of “William O. Ritchie, former head of criminal investigations for D.C. police”:

“As a former homicide commander, I am stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia.”

Read moreWas Justice Scalia Murdered? Forget ‘Conspiracy Theory.’ This Is Real.

Justice Scalia Found Dead “With Pillow Over His Head”, But No Autopsy Ordered

by

“We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled,…”

– Justice Scalia Found Dead “With Pillow Over His Head”, But No Autopsy Ordered:

The death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Saturday morning has taken a turn for the conspiracy-theorist following comments from the Houston businessman who discovered the judge’s body.

This is the news as it was delivered to the general public yesterday morning:

A federal official who asked not to be named said there was no evidence of foul play and it appeared that Scalia died of natural causes.

Read moreJustice Scalia Found Dead “With Pillow Over His Head”, But No Autopsy Ordered

Here’s What Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Thinks About Your Privacy Rights …

by

– This is What Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Thinks About Your Privacy Rights… (Liberty Blitzkrieg, Sep 26, 2013):

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spoke yesterday at the Northern Virginia Technology Council’s (NVTC) Titans breakfast gathering in McLean, Virginia. He discussed the fact that prior to a Supreme Court decision in 1967, there were no constitutional prohibitions on wiretaps because conversations were not explicitly granted privacy protection under the Fourth Amendment. He goes on to imply that he thinks it was better before such privacy rights existed. According to the AP:

Scalia said that before the court’s 1967 opinion on wiretapping, the high court held the view that there were no constitutional prohibitions on wiretaps because conversations were not explicitly granted privacy protection under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against Americans against unreasonable search and seizure of “their persons, houses, papers, and effects.”

But he said then the Warren court stepped in and found that “there’s a generalized right of privacy that comes from penumbras and emanations, blah blah blah, garbage.”

Blah, blah, blah garbage is how a Supreme Court Justice describes privacy protections. Protections that may have prevented FBI surveillance against Martin Luther King Jr., John Lennon and countless other activists. Remember that: All My Heroes Have FBI Files.

Read moreHere’s What Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Thinks About Your Privacy Rights …