Manchester Bomber May Have Been Groomed By UK Intelligence

Manchester Bomber May Have Been Groomed By UK Intelligence:

The alleged perpetrator of last week’s bombing in Manchester has been linked to a Libyan terror group that has been aided in the past by British intelligence authorities – a fact that has been conveniently ignored by mainstream media, despite their intense coverage of the attack.
Manchester bomber Salman Abedi (Photo: Twitter)

MANCHESTER — As the worst terrorist attack to hit the United Kingdom since 2005, last week’s bombing of a concert in Manchester has since been a constant fixture of the news cycle both in the UK and abroad. bsent from mainstream media accounts of the event – and the man allegedly behind it – are several key coincidences that have raised concerns, particularly regarding links between British intelligence and the alleged suicide bomber, British-born Salman Abedi.

Absent from mainstream media accounts of the event, however – and the man allegedly behind it – are several key coincidences that have raised concerns, particularly regarding links between British intelligence and the alleged suicide bomber, British-born Salman Abedi.

Media reports have already established that Abedi, a Libyan national, was radicalized in the hotbed of radical extremism that Libya has become since the U.S.-NATO backed invasion that ousted Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Though most mainstream accounts don’t mention the UK’s role in destabilizing and overthrowing the Libyan government in 2011 – that is, causing Libya’s current state of chaos by arming right-wing rebels who now make up al-Qaeda and ISIS – several have mentioned the link between Abedi and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).

When the Western-orchestrated uprising began in 2011, Abedi and his father, Ramadan Abedi, returned to Libya to fight on behalf of the LIFG. As the West sought to overthrow Gaddafi, British intelligence agency MI5 established a “rat line” that sent anti-Gaddafi exiles living in England to the front lines in Tripoli and elsewhere.

As reported by Middle East Eye, MI5 utilized an “open door” policy that allowed Libyan exiles and British-Libyan citizens to freely travel to Libya to help topple Gaddafi, even though some had been subject to counter-terrorism control orders. One British citizen with ties to Libya was under house arrest at the time for suspected ties to extremist groups. However, he was allowed to travel to Libya with no questions asked.

MI5’s ties to the LIFG go back decades. One MI5 whistleblower asserted that the UK covertly funded the LIFG, which at the time was an al-Qaeda affiliate, in order to help them carry out a failed assassination attempt targeting Gaddafi.

In addition, the Telegraph reported that “A group of Gaddafi dissidents, who were members of the outlawed Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), lived within close proximity to Abedi in Whalley Range” in Manchester. “Among them was Abd al-Baset Azzouz, a father of four from Manchester, who left Britain to run a terrorist network in Libya overseen by Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden’s successor as leader of al-Qaeda,” the report added.

This information suggests that the UK government knowingly and intentionally harbored al-Qaeda-linked terrorists within their borders, suggesting that the UK government’s private stance on al-Qaeda may be different than its public stance, as the ties between these men and the LIFG were hardly a secret.

 Republican U.S. Sens. Mark Kirk of Illinois, Marco Rubio of Florida, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and John McCain of Arizona, display the ‘victory’ sign while on a 2011 visit to Libya.

If true, the UK government would not be alone in its attempts to legitimize the LIFG. In 2011, U.S. Senator and notorious war hawk John McCain met with the group and later asserted that they were not terrorists, but “patriots.” The U.S. government further cemented this perspective in 2015, when it removed the LIFG from its list of designated terror organizations.

In addition, Abedi had been reported to British authorities years ago, when he allegedly expressed support for suicide bombings. The authorities took no action. In fact, the British government allowed him to travel to Libya even after he was flagged as a potential terrorist.

This finding prompted journalist Max Blumenthal to pointedly ask in an article for Alternet: “What did the British government know about Abedi and when did it know it? Was British intelligence attempting to groom Abedi as an informant?”

Such actions on behalf of British intelligence are hardly unheard of. Indeed, MI5 had tried the same with Mohammed Emwazi, better known as the Daesh member “Jihadi John.” MI5 hounded Emwazi for nearly four years in their attempts to recruit him as a spy, threatening him with harsh punishment if he refused to collaborate. Upon leaving the UK in 2013, Emwazi said he blamed MI5 for driving him to “the brink of madness.”

Listen to a troubled Emwazi describe an encounter with MI5 years prior to joining Daesh:

Other documents released by the human rights group Cage UK have revealed how MI5 has not only groomed extremists as collaborators but also worked to push young, vulnerable men down the path of extremism. These findings suggest that Abedi may have been just another one of their pawns.

* * *

PayPal: Donate in USD
PayPal: Donate in EUR
PayPal: Donate in GBP

H/t reader squodgy:

“It’s no longer a surprise when a so called act of terrorism turns out to be government instigated.
From the wake up after 9/11, not one act of terror has lasted for even a week before questions, photos, witnesses and dot joining doubting Thomases gather enough pointers to make a mockery of the official standpoint. Again with Manchester, no solid evidence, no cctv, no iPhone uploads.
One must ask, in view of this, how much is true? As with the London bombings of 2005, which were proven toe a hoax, can the same be true here?
We will never be allowed to know the facts because their credibility would become more laughable than it is now, but we must all start to think further than our noses in order to halt their intended progress towards the Police State which they will achieve by our passive stance and failure to challenge them.”


John McCain & ISIS leader al-Baghdadi ….

… and in the Ukraine …


3 thoughts on “Manchester Bomber May Have Been Groomed By UK Intelligence”


    The alleged and fabricated name of the Manchester bomber (initially fabricated by people related to NYT!), is actually the name of Saudi King ! (Which is why britons have let it be released by american media instead)

    Salman ABeDi is Salman bin ABDalaziz…

    Same as recently in San Bernardino, where three high stature contractors from Blackwater alleged on innocent muslim family of Mr. and Mrs. Farooks – she was named Tashfeen Malik by the media, but when the journalists made a most deplorable raid of their home, full of child toys of their infant, where the only weapons were on the paper listing, left on the table by FBI, the princess-like sweet and weak woman on the passport was of cause named Mrs. Farook, they have shown her ID to the camera…

    So why was she named by a hebrew/arabic sentence Tashfeen Malik – “you will abrade Malik”, where Malik was name of few officials on middle east (probably Iraq prime minister and/or some egyptian official) ?

    In that case of Mrs. Farook in San Bernardino it was absolutely nailed fraudulent name and I strongly suspect this bomber, named almost exactly after Saudi King by american media just a day after Trump’s visit to SA is suspicious at least …


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.