America’s Most Contaminated Nuclear Site Is Vulnerable To Earthquakes & Needs To be Relocated

America’s Most Contaminated Nuclear Site Is Vulnerable To Earthquakes (io9, April 4, 2014):

Nearly 2,000 capsules containing radioactive waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation need to be relocated. That’s because the site was built in an area that’s prone to earthquakes. How could this happen?


The facility, located in in southeastern Washington State, was the world’s largest producer of plutonium during the Cold War. Today, it is America’s most contaminated nuclear site, and the focus of an ongoing cleanup that is costing taxpayers some $2 billion per year.

The 1,936 capsules contain radioactive cesium and strontium that was previously buried in underground tanks, and then later moved into “wet storage”—a 13-foot-deep pool of water that helps cool the corrosive-proof containers, which account for 32 percent of the radioactivity at Hanford.

And, now, according to this Inspector General report from the US Department of Energy, the capsules in the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) need to be moved yet again:

The March 2011 tsunami and subsequent events at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant in Okuma and Futaba, Japan highlighted the vulnerabilities to nuclear facilities from possible seismic and natural disasters that are more severe than the facilities’ original design, or “beyond design threats.” One possible threat is a severe earthquake that may result in loss of power and/or loss of water in the WESF pool.

Making matters worse—yes, as usual, there’s a “worse”— the report notes that the storage facility has been in service for nine years beyond its design life. The age is beginning to show: the concrete in the WESF pool cells has begun to deteriorate due to years of radiation exposure.

So, it’s now incumbent upon the Energy Department to find a new temporary storage facility. I say “temporary” because we still don’t have a permanent nuclear waste repository. But, no worries, the government has set a goal to open such a facility…in 2048.

2 thoughts on “America’s Most Contaminated Nuclear Site Is Vulnerable To Earthquakes & Needs To be Relocated”

  1. Here in CA, we are getting it from all sides, west brings us Fukushima poisons, North, we get the radiation from WA state, east, Mess in New Mexico, South, the mess in San Diego.
    What a friggin’ disaster. I have some friends in WA state, and their state of denial is shocking………I cannot believe how people can live close to something like this and pretend it isn’t happening…….
    Thanks for staying on these stories. Compared to these, the rest of it, political and financial are really not very important.

  2. Looks like we’re all in the same pot here.
    We’ve got Sellafield, Dounreay, Porton Down, Sheerness, but we’re only the size of Florida.
    Then we have Chemtrails daily, and still all the dumbf***s don’t see these continuous grey heavy clouds as strange.
    Hanford has been ignored for decades. As I’ve said before, the tanks are simple carbon steel welded atmospheric storage tanks. Theoretically no problem, but in the long term anyone with nous (a Lancashire term for common sense) knows that over seven decades half inch thick plate, if even partially exposed to the elements, oxidises.
    Rust represents one tenth of its volume as original metal (it is 10 times the volume of the metal that oxidises).
    So, after seventy years, it is fair to assume the integrity of ALL the tanks is less than 50% in the exposed surfaces.
    That means uncontrolled seepages leading inevitably to steady leakages into the water table.
    Bankrupt government cannot do a thing to resolve it other than commission massive polypropylene/GRP replacements & pump everything into these….but Hey!!! …Radioactivity ain’t nothin’ to get het over!.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.