– ???? 1?? / ?????????? ???????? (atmc, May 23, 2011):
Google translation:
Unit 1 nuclear power plant Fukushima / dose of a nuclear reactor nuclear reactor state Hukushima
Location: Unit 1 nuclear power plant Hukushima
Date: Sun Mar 15, 2011 (Tuesday) to May 23, 2011 (Mon)
Current values??: D / W: 0.425Sv / h, S / C: 201Sv / h
| ??? | ???? 1?? |
| ??? | 2011?03?15?(?)?2011?05?23?(?) |
| ????? | D/W: 0.425Sv/h ?S/C: 201Sv/h |
|
 |
Plant parameters are published by NISA (reactor state) to graph the amount of nuclear radiation.
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant reactor 1 can be checked on a daily basis – such as water temperature, pressure dose of 5 items.
As soon as the data is published and updated as the chart.
No. 4 was stopped for inspection in the absence of a nuclear reactor fuel assemblies, are excluded from the list.
Meaning of the terms in the graph below.
D / W … stands dry well. The main thing containment. S / C … Sapuresshonchenba stands. I pressure suppression chamber.
? The value of the graph shows the maximum absolute value of the day.
Thank you for the excellent graph and article( graphs are a great way to explain things quickly). The fact you are staying on this important story is appreciated more than I can express. Many of us see this as a growing threat to our entire way of living. I agree with Vahanus, this is the end of the world as we know it. I am in Northern CA, radiation has shown up in our strawberries, milk and other products. I live in a coastal rainforest, and much of the radiation lands here in our trees and plants. Large pine trees are showing damage, the leafs on the branches are turning grey. Since the story has been blacked out, and our state is broke, there are no agencies or persons to whom I can address questions.
Are there any sources that are still tracking the stream of radiation? I know the US, Canada and Norway have shut off their monitoring systems, but is anyone finding a way to track it?
Thank you again for your brave and excellent reporting; there are powerful forces working to black out this story completely; many sites that were covering it have backed off completely. I don’t get it, do they believe the problem will go away if it is ignored?
Could you please explain Sieverts to those of us who are not well-versed in nuclear science?
Sincerely,
Marilyn Gjerdrum